3 ms·
If the excuse is true and the "ornate" language really is a dense representation of information then it should be fairly trivial to have an LLM agent unsummariz
by tinco 3y ago
If the excuse is true and the "ornate" language really is a dense representation of information then it should be fairly trivial to have an LLM agent unsummarize it.
There could be a webservice that offers a parallel track of layman's translations of any paper.
- heydenberk 3y agoSounds like you're referring to https://www.explainpaper.com/ https://www.explainpaper.com/ :)
- noduerme 3y agoAn LLM won't tell you that the authors obfuscated it because they don't know what the fuck they did. You need a human for that.
- estebarb 3y agoI haven't tried other models, but if you prompt a recent ChatGTP with "academic style" and ask it to "review and provide feedback" of a paragraph you wrote it will reword it using the most fancy, overselling words it can find. I liked to use it for improving grammar and style, but in later iterations ChatGTP started writing garbage... I'm not sure if that is because training, feedback from users or an attempt to make usage is LLMs obvious to teachers.