4 ms·
As far as I know, you cannot defend yourself in the same way the person or institution attacks you. That is, if you want to respond, to defend yourself in cour
by pdemb 15y ago
As far as I know, you cannot defend yourself in the same way the person or institution attacks you. That is, if you want to respond, to defend yourself in court, you have to fight using normal court procedures, not e-court procedures. Proceeding in normal (pen and paper) way is more expensive than proceeding in electronic form, though the former is the only way to cancel the decision of e-court.
Moreover, the vast amount of cases solved by such small number of workers suggests that processes in such e-courts are short and irrelevant. The sentence is automaticaly set to 'guilty'.
EDIT: clarification
- ajuc 15y agoYes, but that's exactly the idea - to speed up the irrelevant obvious cases where sued person don't even try to defen himself - there's many such cases, and before they were solved in normal procedure, with tons of buerocracy, and that used up judges and other workers time, making more complicated cases longer as well.
- pdemb 15y agoSorry, but this is not the level where whole case should be solved. The court is by definition a place where both sides speak, and e-court is a place where only one side speaks, and she doesn't even has to prove she's right.
- ajuc 15y agohttp://www.dziennikwschodni.pl/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100622/PRZEGLADPRASY/587171411 http://www.dziennikwschodni.pl/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20... "Elektroniczna procedura przeznaczona jest dla tzw. spraw upominawczych, które wytaczają głównie dostawcy masowych usług, np. zakłady energetyczne czy operatorzy komórkowi. Chodzi w tych sprawach o należności dobrze udokumentowane, a dłużnikami są zwykle osoby fizyczne, które zazwyczaj nie kwestionują sądowego nakazu. Gdy nie ma odwołania, nabiera on skutku prawomocnego wyroku." It means e-court is for cases where there is good documentation, and persons that were judged can appeal, but if they don't (and they usually don't), these cases are processed automatically. "Tylko w 4 tys. spraw e-sąd nie wydał nakazów i np. oddalił pozew, umarzając postępowanie. Sprzeciwów złożono zaledwie 3229, a więc w nieco ponad 2 proc. spraw. W takich sytuacjach sprawy przekazywane są do zwykłych sądów." Only in 4 tousand cases e-court changed default decision, there were also 3229 appeals (2% of cases - this artcle is old a few months so this won't add to 2 000 000 cases). In such cases the matter is transferred to regular court. What's wrong with that?
- pdemb 15y agoAppeal should be possible in e-form too.