Thank you very much Jim for your attention and time, spent to understand what was "wrong" in that report. Those graphs are one the most misleading thing I have

Thank you very much Jim for your attention and time, spent to understand what was "wrong" in that report. Those graphs are one the most misleading thing I have ever encountered. It is also paradoxical that effort is factored in the final ranking: if some place has good output in spite of low investment, it means that it has "natural" good output (e.g. "inhabitants of X need little policing because they already incline towards honesty"), which means it should - if anything - be ranked higher!!!