3 ms·
It might have been a marginally acceptable argument 5 years back. Not anymore. the Winkelvii have redobuled the image of the charlatans they are, alongside ever
by ramraj07 3y ago
It might have been a marginally acceptable argument 5 years back. Not anymore. the Winkelvii have redobuled the image of the charlatans they are, alongside every single person I have ever encountered in my life or in media who promulgated crypto bs. I have long since been successfully using crypto advocacy as a way to avoid people I should just not bother with and have been living a happy life.
- ETH_start 3y agoTo me the argument has gotten dramatically stronger over the last five years as crypto's real world utility has grown and its full potential has come closer to being realized, while increasingly mainstream figures—including the most successful venture capitalists of this generation—acknowledge its inherent utility. The anti-crypto contigent are consistently small-minded neurotic individuals who could be safely ignored if they did not back repressive government measures like futile COVID lockdowns, or a "War on Drugs" or "War on Crypto".