> Traditionally, there has been a real lack of "better C" languages. There never has been. There has been a lack of really successfull C alternatives for some

> Traditionally, there has been a real lack of "better C" languages. There never has been. There has been a lack of really successfull C alternatives for some time (after everything that wasn't unixish or Windows died, except for MacOS and Objective-C) - and still is. Rust is still less used than Pascal has been 30 years ago.