4 ms·
You say this as if the only way this happens is through a big top down conspiracy. In reality it's several separate actors with aligned incentives that create u
by shkkmo 3y ago
You say this as if the only way this happens is through a big top down conspiracy. In reality it's several separate actors with aligned incentives that create unnecessary headwinds to the adoption of cost saving medical advances
To pretend that there aren't groups who will work to delay and limit the rollout of industry shattering technology like this is naive at best.
- skissane 3y ago> You say this as if the only way this happens is through a big top down conspiracy. In reality it's several separate actors with aligned incentives that create unnecessary headwinds to the adoption of cost saving medical advances I didn’t intend my comment as saying anything about whether this suggested phenomenon is “top-down” or “bottom-up”. I think my two counterarguments-“other countries exist” and “contrary to collective political self-interest” have about as much force in either case. > To pretend that there aren't groups who will work to delay and limit the rollout of industry shattering technology like this is naive at best. I never claimed such groups don’t exist - I’m sure there are some individuals and groups who (consciously or not) possess the agenda you describe. The real question is whether they will succeed in achieving that goal-I’m sceptical they will make any significant difference to whether or when these advances are achieved