3 ms·
I also responded to it. > There's no reason to suspect a generic asset is infringing on it's face, but for models trained on the open internet it's an entirely
by maxbond 3y ago
I also responded to it.
> There's no reason to suspect a generic asset is infringing on it's face, but for models trained on the open internet it's an entirely unanswered question.
As in, there's no reason not to give the benefit of the doubt to a traditional asset, but it's not yet understood how copyright works with a generative asset.
Am I missing something?
- SenAnder 3y ago> it's not yet understood how copyright works with a generative asset. Except if you have the rights to all the works used to train your AI model. In that case, there is no risk that you are infringing.