Yes I’m sure their original rationale is thought out, but reading the Reddit threads attached of the various developers trying to navigate the policy doesn’t gi

Yes I’m sure their original rationale is thought out, but reading the Reddit threads attached of the various developers trying to navigate the policy doesn’t give faith that there’s thought going on in application. How do they verify copyright material isn’t in static assets? I can’t imagine it’s very thorough. I imagine most of it is based on attestation. Regarding your question, I don’t share those views but can understand how they exist simultaneously. With an open hand, like was afforded internet and technologies, it could shape the world in hard to imagine ways as did the internet. However like the early internet it could have been strangled in the crib through knee jerk regulation and prohibitions. I think AI model builders and hosters want safe harbor similar to content hosters and providers allowing the end use of the technology to be regulated but the providers to be allowed to operate on a best effort basis. For instance the copyright question here is strangling any game that uses a generative model. A reasonable legal outcome is that it’s fair use to incorporate copyright material, but the output must not violate copyrights.