2 ms·
On top of the requirement to make it perfectly drawn I take issue with the "but it should be better than a flag I would draw by hand". That's a useless metric b
by dandellion 3y ago
On top of the requirement to make it perfectly drawn I take issue with the "but it should be better than a flag I would draw by hand". That's a useless metric because we don't know how the author draws by hand.
I assumed they would have enough brain cells to draw the flag without cutting in half all the stars in the margins. But they must have failed kindergarten because I assumed wrong.
- dandellion 3y agoI started again picking a number at random without looking at the questions. This is what it had to say: "You answered 39.29% of questions correctly with an average log-loss of 3.880. This means you would have scored better by just leaving your guesses at 50% for every single question.. On average there were 0.00% of people who did better at this game than you. If this was an exam and I was grading it on a curve, I would give you an A+. If you had been better calibrated, you could have scored in the top 23.41%, and I would have given you a B+." So I did worse than random but 0% did better than me and got an A+. Nice.