3 ms·
Kind of a disappointing paper, really. Essentially zero details about their technique, just tables showing that, with the methodology they used, it does indeed
by Michelangelo11 3y ago
Kind of a disappointing paper, really. Essentially zero details about their technique, just tables showing that, with the methodology they used, it does indeed achieve good results.
I get that that's par for the course for science these days, but to me as a developer working on LLMs, the paper is essentially valueless (of course, I'm sure it incrementally raises the authors' prestige in their corner of academia, as was no doubt its purpose).
- glandium 3y agoCheck the very last page. Their prompt is there.
- Roark66 3y agoAlso: >Code and scripts will be released later. Hey, wanna team up and author a few articles like that?</sarcasm> I wonder how many it'll take before one can put a title of a "ML researcher" on top of their CV.
- ec109685 3y agoIt’s a simple topic made much much more complex by embedding it into a scientific paper. Way more time should have been spent on examples and the prompt.