> I believe the article is factually correct-ish, but is sensationalized and is spreading FUD and causing unnecessary potential panic. This wording is clear to

> I believe the article is factually correct-ish, but is sensationalized and is spreading FUD and causing unnecessary potential panic. This wording is clear to me. If this was in your original comment, I wouldn’t assume that you’re recommending to disregard safety measures. Otherwise “ridiculous” or “:rolleyes:” are very ambiguous to me.