4 ms·
Seriously? You're still confused? I believe the article is factually correct-ish, but is sensationalized and is spreading FUD and causing unnecessary potentia
by jeremyt 3y ago
Seriously? You're still confused?
I believe the article is factually correct-ish, but is sensationalized and is spreading FUD and causing unnecessary potential panic.
That's why. I'm downplaying because it needs downplaying.
- thih9 3y ago> I believe the article is factually correct-ish, but is sensationalized and is spreading FUD and causing unnecessary potential panic. This wording is clear to me. If this was in your original comment, I wouldn’t assume that you’re recommending to disregard safety measures. Otherwise “ridiculous” or “:rolleyes:” are very ambiguous to me.