3 ms·
I only called it out to note that the lack of walkability in the area made this bridge stand out. As someone who thoroughly enjoyed the piece, this smells like
by pohl 3y ago
I only called it out to note that the lack of walkability in the area made this bridge stand out.
As someone who thoroughly enjoyed the piece, this smells like ignoring the obvious answer to the question. The place lacks it. The bridge provides more of it. Mystery solved, no? Need meets provision!
I felt the same way when I read about the Grainger employees complaining about the litter — which is a clue, evidence of people walking there — but you didn't follow that thread.
- true_religion 3y agoIf you were assuming the bridge was to provide walkability then the next question would be “why connect these two points instead of somewhere more populous?” That would lead you right down the same search as the author.
- pohl 3y agoYou're in luck. There are about a billion instances of "why isn't my urban planning optimal?" out there for you to dig into.