3 ms·
> Without it, you would get heavily populated states like New York and California dictating policy for the rest of the country. With it, we have tyranny of the
by PrimeMcFly 3y ago
> Without it, you would get heavily populated states like New York and California dictating policy for the rest of the country.
With it, we have tyranny of the ignorant.
Ignorant is maybe too mean, but if I had to use one catch all word that can apply to policies (not necessarily people), esp regarding things like transgender care, abortion and climate change, I think it fits.
- manuelabeledo 3y agoI wouldn't say "ignorant", but things like voting against progressive energy policies because your state economy is dying a slow death [0] shouldn't be allowed. [0] https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/29/politics/manchin-reelection-biden-climate-agenda/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/29/politics/manchin-reelection-b...
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoI edited my answer to clarify it refers to policies not people, but as a single catch all word I think it fits pretty well. Although in the example you linked 'corrupt' would be much more apt.
- freitzkriesler2 3y ago> With it, we have tyranny of the ignorant. Good.
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoHardly.