> I don’t think that way but that seems to follow from your suggestion. You should re-study classical logic. You turned the proposition "If you are ashamed of

> I don’t think that way but that seems to follow from your suggestion. You should re-study classical logic. You turned the proposition "If you are ashamed of something, you should not be obliged to leave" into "You have left therefore you must be ashamed of something". This is a fallacy. I wrote "if P then Q or not Q" (if ashamed you are free to stay and you are free to not stay), which you turned into "if not Q then P" ("you did not stay therefore you must be ashamed). Similarly, turning "If you are ashamed of something you should be free to fix it" into "If you are ashamed of something you are obliged to fix it" is another logical fallacy. Just because someone is free to do something does not make them obligated to do it.