Often the overall notion of something being good or bad is extremely dependent on the specific details of how it's applied, and their dynamics. While pooling ca

Often the overall notion of something being good or bad is extremely dependent on the specific details of how it's applied, and their dynamics. While pooling capital or wealth and sharing it among a voluntary, mutually interested group may work for making that wealth grow (after all it's the basis of market exchange and so much built prosperity), this shouldn't be used as a justification for defending forced collectivization and collectivism. These latter tactics might work sometimes in very specific contexts, but their dynamics make them very different and much more plausibly destructive than useful, or even moral.