> How could they not see that they would have a giant backlash on their hands? Did they overestimate their ability to get away with the "it's for our children"

> How could they not see that they would have a giant backlash on their hands? Did they overestimate their ability to get away with the "it's for our children" excuse this badly?" I imagine it wasn't an environment where one could argue those concerns on fair grounds without it being seen as enabling CSAM and shot down. I also imagine it's enticing to call their competitors' products "pedo-phones".