3 ms·

Shut up with that… you vote for the least worst option you got in a full panel of… 2? 5? Maybe 10 people? If you don’t vote, it’s held against you, but when som

by thiht 3y ago

Shut up with that… you vote for the least worst option you got in a full panel of… 2? 5? Maybe 10 people? If you don’t vote, it’s held against you, but when someone is elected it’s somehow your fault and you deserve it? Even if you didn’t vote for that person? Even if you voted for them and it happens they were lying? You make no sense, and this whole rhetoric makes no sense. “Fully democratic” implies this is as good as it gets, yet no one is happy with it. The so called democratic process objectively sucks.

kenmacd 3y ago
> The so called democratic process objectively sucks. It's not the democratic process that's the issue, it's the first-past-the-post. Fortunately the party to win the 2015 election vowed: "To make sure that every vote counts, the Government will undertake consultations on electoral reform, and will take action to ensure that 2015 will be the last federal election conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system.", so it must be fixed...