This is pretty much the best marketing for IPFS. The availability and number of backups of any price of data is directly correlated with the number of people th

This is pretty much the best marketing for IPFS. The availability and number of backups of any price of data is directly correlated with the number of people that use it. For example, if LLM NN model weights are distributed with IPFS instead of corporate infrastructure (basically zero redundancy) the popular models would be very available, and have essentially near zero chance of being lost. To state that again, the llama models likely have tens of thousands of downloads, which would mean tens of thousands of servers and backups of the data, versus what we have now, which is essentially just one. We need IPFS for data distribution. Tightly knit integration with git repos is an obvious match as well.