> Again, we recognize that corruption took place Who is we? The comment you’re replying to make a very solid case that most people don’t. > but is unfortunate

> Again, we recognize that corruption took place Who is we? The comment you’re replying to make a very solid case that most people don’t. > but is unfortunately legal Burisma may be legal but I doubt Chinese extortion or election interference by a government agency would be considered legal > certainly not limited to one specific party I don’t think anyone pretended it was. > This corruption should be ended, but there's one little problem. You. As in me? > You don't care about corruption You are being awful and have no reason to write such a thing about someone that is conversing with you politely. I don’t think you actually want to discuss anything, since you don’t seem to be responding to any of the points you are replying to and I’m going to ignore you now.