4 ms·
Wikipedia editors/guidelines are generally not in favor of "opinionated" adjectives, and the use of "weird looking" in your query sounds a lot like something th
by kikokikokiko 3y ago
Wikipedia editors/guidelines are generally not in favor of "opinionated" adjectives, and the use of "weird looking" in your query sounds a lot like something that would be frowned upon on a wikipedia article. This makes it hard for your search to retrieve good results on this corpus of knowledge.
- znagengast 3y agoIt's also largely dependent on the embeddings model as others have mentioned. Even if wikipedia doesn't have any words specifically referring to that monkey as "weird", the model itself would know to correlate this monkey's embeddings with the "weird" concept. The main issue with this particular implementation is the model used (all-minilm-l6-v2) which is designed for speed and efficiency over accuracy.
- kristopolous 3y agoCouldn't someone pretty easily merge it with something more informal? For instance, Reddit data dump (https://academictorrents.com/details/7c0645c94321311bb05bd879ddee4d0eba08aaee https://academictorrents.com/details/7c0645c94321311bb05bd87...), filter for Wikipedia links, include a context of the thread, combine that with the contents of the article