4 ms·

You can, I posted the link in different comment, you can load everything, but you haven't bothered to look or explore, but using pagination means you never seen

You can, I posted the link in different comment, you can load everything, but you haven't bothered to look or explore, but using pagination means you never seen everything anyways. I don't think most people come across a 500 comment issue and need to start in the middle. They're reading top down and expanding as they get deeper into the conversation. They're literally using pagination to display the issues, you can see it yourself. You think I'm a younger person because I disagree with you? That's classic. You're the only one I see complaining, I have no issues with it. If anything it sounds like you don't understand GitHub and you're unwilling to learn anything new or or even try to overcome your old and decrepit ways with tools that are readily available and simple to use. Whatever..., btw I'm well over the hill.

38 3y ago
> You can, I posted the link in different comment I am not going to prove your own point for you. if you have some link, you should provide it. > You're the only one I see complaining ooh yeah brother, great argument: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/29811/identify-the-fallacy https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/29811/identif... > If anything it sounds like you don't understand GitHub and you're unwilling to learn anything new or or even try to overcome your old and decrepit ways I am willing, I have been using the "load more" interface for as long as its been around. its terrible. from my EXPERIENCE with both systems, pagination is the more pleasant experience. with pagination, you can even link to a specific page, to direct someone to the beginning of an important sequence of comments. you might have this with the new system, but before you know it you're running into a load more again, making Ctrl+F useless.
inferiorhuman 3y ago
I don't think most people come across a 500 comment issue and need to start in the middle. a.) The threshold for reducing clutter is well less than 500, and comments disappear for a variety of reasons besides. If Github deems a comment irrelevant they'll try to collapse it. b.) Yes, I often want to start in the middle. If I'm searching for a specific error message or class some of the search results include issues where that keyword was only mentioned in a hidden comment.

38 3y ago

> You can, I posted the link in different comment I am not going to prove your own point for you. if you have some link, you should provide it. > You're the only one I see complaining ooh yeah brother, great argument: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/29811/identify-the-fallacy https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/29811/identif... > If anything it sounds like you don't understand GitHub and you're unwilling to learn anything new or or even try to overcome your old and decrepit ways I am willing, I have been using the "load more" interface for as long as its been around. its terrible. from my EXPERIENCE with both systems, pagination is the more pleasant experience. with pagination, you can even link to a specific page, to direct someone to the beginning of an important sequence of comments. you might have this with the new system, but before you know it you're running into a load more again, making Ctrl+F useless.

inferiorhuman 3y ago

I don't think most people come across a 500 comment issue and need to start in the middle. a.) The threshold for reducing clutter is well less than 500, and comments disappear for a variety of reasons besides. If Github deems a comment irrelevant they'll try to collapse it. b.) Yes, I often want to start in the middle. If I'm searching for a specific error message or class some of the search results include issues where that keyword was only mentioned in a hidden comment.