2 ms·
My point was that the person was specifically disparaging Facebook users, although the text of the bill is also not remotely as clear as it should be. The enti
by brailsafe 3y ago
My point was that the person was specifically disparaging Facebook users, although the text of the bill is also not remotely as clear as it should be.
The entire entity of Facebook (not meta) could go away tomorrow and the only people who'd care are probably the ones who voted this government in, property boomers and their forgotten gen x offspring.
The rest would just switch their messaging platform if they use messenger, and go back to Craigslist for classifieds.
Edit: To clarify, I'm still being hyperbolic. All kinds of people voted for all kinds of candidates, but in my city most of the extremely wealthy neighborhoods voted for Liberal candidates, so it's a bit fun to poke at. Likewise, the only people I personally know who still use Facebook directly for anything unrelated to selling stuff or direct messaging, are just quite a lot older
- paxys 3y agoFacebook has 4 billion active users across the world. They are not all "boomers" and whatever else you want to call them. There will be much more negative impact on the world if all Facebook properties disappeared tomorrow then all of Canadian news media put together.
- brailsafe 3y agoYou keep roping in other properties into this, if you want to do that, use their parent company name. 4b users on facebook as in Facebook seems a bit of a reach to me at this point. 4b on all properties, ya maybe. Either way, while I could see it having a negative impact, it would mostly be as an advertising platform, and the net positive of that going away might bring it to neutral. I know it's imused in some places as their primary messaging service or something, but it seems likely they're not doing much unique here. So what is this harm you speak of?