4 ms·
By this definition, censorship is in the eye of the beholder? I understand the slippery slope argument, but I don't think I have much of an issue with the vast
by edmundsauto 3y ago
By this definition, censorship is in the eye of the beholder? I understand the slippery slope argument, but I don't think I have much of an issue with the vast majority of stuff that gets highlighted as being blocked. Spam, antivaxxers, Nazis... all content I don't want to receive.
- AnthonyMouse 3y agoIt's not in the eye of the beholder. It's blocking which is not in the control of the recipient. There is nothing wrong with a filter that tries to block anti-vaxxers, as long as you're explicitly aware that it's happening and can freely and easily turn it off.