4 ms·
Compared to 17% when pre-trained on Python. Looks like the debate on whether or not HTML is a programming language is settled!
by xeckr 3y ago
Compared to 17% when pre-trained on Python. Looks like the debate on whether or not HTML is a programming language is settled!
- codetrotter 3y agoWas the HTML corpus it trained on only HTML and text, or was there JS code in the HTML?
- sp332 3y agoThere sure was. Here is a snippet from the very first example in the html.json file: <input type="text" id="searchQuery" name="searchQuery" placeholder="Enter name..."> <button onclick="searchEmployees()">Search</button> </div> <script> function searchEmployees() { var input, filter, table, tr, td, i, txtValue; ...etc... There's no code in the repo, but the paper says this about how the inputs were generated: For all the selected languages except HTML, we adopt an in-depth evolution, by asking GPT-3.5 to rewrite the seed instruction (Python) into a more complicated version relevant to the target language (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, C, C++, Java, or Go). However, for HTML, we adopt in-breadth evolution to produce a brand-new HTML-related instruction...