5 ms·
the only downside for me is that there aren't many mature UI libs for it yet. I was evaluating it for a Tauri-based project but I went with React instead becaus
by dihrbtk 3y ago
the only downside for me is that there aren't many mature UI libs for it yet. I was evaluating it for a Tauri-based project but I went with React instead because of this.
- ttfkam 3y agoYep, the amount of UI component libraries for React is truly staggering. I myself am more of a clean, standard HTML with PicoCSS kind of dev, but that model doesn't work for everyone. Some might be surprised how much plain old HTML and the ease of development for Svelte components narrows that gap, but I'll be the first to admit the gap absolutely exists.
- throw1234651234 3y agoYou guys can try https://bulma.io/ https://bulma.io/ as a middle-ground. It provides some fundamentals styles that aren't married to JavaScript, so there are never any conflicts with any SPA version. It's not widely used, but it worked well for us before going to Material UI as the team grew and the designers wanted something everyone is familiar with.
- ttfkam 3y agoYeah, serves the same niche as PicoCSS for me. Always good to learn about alternatives, especially relatively non-disruptive changes like a CSS skin. FWIW: Material UI for Svelte has been around for a while as well. https://sveltematerialui.com/ https://sveltematerialui.com/
- throw1234651234 3y agoSeems like a bunch of minor things, but learned a lot from you today, appreciate it.