4 ms·
Isn't that because laws relating to physical harm already exist and are well-established? There's not really much legal regulation yet in terms of specific AI-d
by figlett 3y ago
Isn't that because laws relating to physical harm already exist and are well-established? There's not really much legal regulation yet in terms of specific AI-driven harms. We're probably yet still to find out all the ways in which it can be abused.
- RandomLensman 3y agoWhat AI harms would not already be addressed by existing laws? Do you think there are gaps in criminal codes, for example?
- Eisenstein 3y ago> What AI harms would not already be addressed by existing laws? I think that's the whole point -- we don't know.
- alphabetting 3y agoNot an expert but I'd imagine there are a lot of gaps in relation to deepfakes
- RandomLensman 3y agoWhat you have in mind? Something against ownership and creation?
- Turing_Machine 3y agoPeople have been making fake photographs for going on two centuries now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippolyte_Bayard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippolyte_Bayard
- dudeinjapan 3y agoPerhaps the issue is "psychological harms" which are not yet criminal, but we have an up-and-coming generation of law grads who believe they should be.