8 ms·
Does this mean that people undergoing chemo shouldn't have any supplements at all? Lutein, for example, is a strong antioxidant but also has anti-cancer proper
by jasfi 3y ago
Does this mean that people undergoing chemo shouldn't have any supplements at all?
Lutein, for example, is a strong antioxidant but also has anti-cancer properties.
Edit: thanks for the replies!
- cmrdporcupine 3y agoWhen my mother in law (RIP) was going through treatment for lymphoma, the doctors did in fact advise against taking supplements. Because -- either doing nothing (waste of $$), doing "something" that could likely discourage cell death and therefore maybe cancer, or doing... who knows what? because under-regulated and studied. Chemo is rough, for sure.
- ramoz 3y agoI was advised not to take supplements or antioxidants during chemo. "The healthier you are, then so too is your cancer." was something that threw me off a bit. Edit: just to be clear, at the point in which you already have cancer, the most important treatment is the science of chemotherapy. Antioxidants can in turn “strengthen” tumor cells (just as they do regular cells) and cause chemo resistance/refractory.
- brink 3y agoSounds like a mythical riddle. "To survive, you must go knock on the doors of death."
- taylodl 3y agoChemotherapy is deadly. The idea is to administer enough to kill the cancer but not kill the patient. It's literally a well-regulated and well-monitored poison. Don't get the wrong idea - chemotherapies are among the best therapies we have for treating cancer. I'm not anti-Western medicine or anti-chemotherapy or anything like that, it's just we have to recognize the nature of the beast and what it is exactly that we're doing when administering it.
- adamredwoods 3y ago>> "The healthier you are, then so too is your cancer." was something that threw me off a bit. There is debate to this. I've spoken with oncologists that say that you need your organs to survive the chemo process, so you should be taking care of yourself and eating a normal diet. Another reason oncologists don't want supplements involved is that it can interfere with the chemo absorption. Sometimes it can enhance the chemo. It really depends on the chemo and the supplements.
- boxed 3y agoIt might just mean "wait for replication"
- thenerdhead 3y agoShould not take high doses of antioxidants to be more specific.
- CrHn3 3y agoI don't think this is the case for antioxidants across the board. Peter Langjoen, who has pioneered CoQ10 research and used it extensively clinically addressed coQ10 use with chemotherapy in this interview and reluctancy of cancer centers to allow patients to use it: https://youtu.be/9Z7X9WPWv4Y?si=avOV0u4ruy_zNslr&t=746 https://youtu.be/9Z7X9WPWv4Y?si=avOV0u4ruy_zNslr&t=746. While coenzyme Q10 may show indirect anticancer activity through its effect(s) on the immune system, there is evidence to suggest that analogs of this compound can suppress cancer growth directly[1]. 1. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/hp/coenzyme-q10-pdq https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/hp/coenzym...
- glonq 3y agoIn literally 3 hours, I'm about to start my first iv chemo session (18 weeks total). And yes I was instructed to not take any supplements, especially naturopathic stuff but even including common multivitamins.
- taylodl 3y agoNot sure why you were getting downvoted - I'm of the age where I've had several friends and acquaintances deal with cancer and have had to have chemotherapy. In most cases they were instructed to not take any supplements. They especially don't want you taking naturopathic stuff because that's so poorly regulated and they really have no idea what it is you were actually taking and how it might affect your therapy. My understanding is this is pretty much standard operating procedure.