3 ms·
The elevation profile is great, for sure, but I meant more like...difficulty, rather than grade? I don't know the exact word to use, but sometimes you have wel
by gorbypark 3y ago
The elevation profile is great, for sure, but I meant more like...difficulty, rather than grade? I don't know the exact word to use, but sometimes you have well used, well marked trails and other times you have a "trail" that maybe gets used a few times a year and is more like a choose your own adventure with a rock cairn or two every couple hundred meters if you are lucky.
- ijustlovemath 3y agoAh, I see! I'm not sure if OSM data can have that information, but it would be great! Some kind of bushwhack out of 10 rating?
- aembleton 3y agoOSM does have that data, and I've noticed that mapy.cz takes it into account. There are sac_scale [1] and smoothness keys [2] 1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale 2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
- ijustlovemath 3y agosac seems a little too broad to me; most trails would be level 2 or below, without communicating much more than a simple elevation profile already gives you.
- ihatehn 3y agoI think Komoot uses openstreetmap and is a little more hiking oriented, that might be useful to you.