3 ms·
Number 3 doesn't really make sense. I wouldn't get copyright if I told a human artist "draw a dog". Why would that change just because I'm telling an AI to do i
by gaganyaan 3y ago
Number 3 doesn't really make sense. I wouldn't get copyright if I told a human artist "draw a dog". Why would that change just because I'm telling an AI to do it?
- Ajedi32 3y agoI oversimplified that point a bit for brevity's sake, but I'd say I agree that some level of creative input from the human operator should be required in order for the work to be copyrightable. If I draw a black 100px*100px square in MS paint that's not copyrightable, nor should typing "dog" with a seed of "1" into Stable Diffusion be. But as soon as even the smallest level of creative input is involved, yeah it should be copyrightable. Also, kinda beside the point, but: > I wouldn't get copyright if I told a human artist "draw a dog". If they were working for hire, yeah you absolutely would.
- gaganyaan 3y agoYou can get very creative in your instructions to a human, but that creativity still won't get you any copyright. And afaik, in a work for hire scenario, the artist just agrees to transfer their copyright automatically. If there's no copyright in the first place, there's nothing to transfer