3 ms·
Alas it does. Think, e.g. about the backlash against asset managers for pursuing sustainability agendas. Closer to the topic, think also about the "furore" and
by nologic01 3y ago
Alas it does. Think, e.g. about the backlash against asset managers for pursuing sustainability agendas.
Closer to the topic, think also about the "furore" and supposed panic at Google that they are not capitalizing (literally) on their AI leadership.
- justinclift 3y ago> pursuing sustainability agendas My impression is that the "sustainability agendas" these asset managers were pursuing turned out to be er... mostly bullshit. Along the lines of companies "green washing" stuff that was not in fact green. Also stuff marketed as "socially progressive" as a sales tactic.
- nologic01 3y agoIt just goes to show that if you want real change you need to get really serious about it. As in: change the regulatory and legal framework. Self-regulation doesn't work. You just get an army of consultants, rating agencies and other intermediaries providing "assurance" for-profit, never biting the hand that feeds them. PS. For the record and while tangential to the digital monopoly discussion, it is still a good thing that we got the ESG and greenwashing debacle. Just a few years ago nobody but the perennial "tree huggers" was even talking about sustainability. Now it is a much more broad based discussion although obviously it has not landed anywhere yet. I wish people would also take regulation of the digital sphere more seriously as it is the backbone on which we will solve all these other problems.