3 ms·
>Is it a coincidence that 1280 = 2⁷ * 10? 1280 is the nearest threshold we can estimate to, for the reason you've describe. In the OP's title it suggests "exac
by Shrezzing 3y ago
>Is it a coincidence that 1280 = 2⁷ * 10?
1280 is the nearest threshold we can estimate to, for the reason you've describe. In the OP's title it suggests "exactly 1280", while the original published piece in Science[1] uses the phrase "around 1280".
[1]https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487