> they assume because they have no use for it that no else does either. I'll go a step further: Crypto has no use case that hasn't been already solved by the

> they assume because they have no use for it that no else does either. I'll go a step further: Crypto has no use case that hasn't been already solved by the current financial system and it is not private at all. In fact most users have dwindling and no confidence with crypto: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/10/majority-of-americans-arent-confident-in-the-safety-and-reliability-of-cryptocurrency/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/10/majority-... > Again, I've tried to win them with reason, and even put challenges in order for them to put their money where their mouths are; but they just shirk it and go on about disparaging it without any real substance. And where is the substance in the crypto industry? The answer is the sum of the amount of use cases they are trying to find. Zero.