3 ms·
Erm, what? If it was classical mechanical 28 "balls" with pairwise interactions, complexity would be "merely O(28^2)". But it is not, which is what I said. I
by rich_sasha 3y ago
Erm, what?
If it was classical mechanical 28 "balls" with pairwise interactions, complexity would be "merely O(28^2)". But it is not, which is what I said.
I mean, there is some irony in accusing people of not understanding the most basic of mathematical terms, while not understanding (repeated!) explanations of the comment.
- ftxbro 3y agoThis is an internet comment section, if you are talking about things being exponentially hard and part of your comment is asking "why this is not merely O(28^2) harder (or do you need the electrons too?)" then of course people are going to think you don't understand what exponential means.
- rich_sasha 3y agoI'm losing faith in th average Internet user's ability to read...