> I also dont see a compelling reason why an 11 year old (the average age of a first time porn user) should freely be allowed to watch a woman be savagely sodom

> I also dont see a compelling reason why an 11 year old (the average age of a first time porn user) should freely be allowed to watch a woman be savagely sodomized by a group of men as is the case on a typical porn site's homepage. Epic straw man? Perhaps? Nowhere in the ruling is any compelling reason claimed for what you just described. And making Pornhub less private for adults won’t stop children from online searching for “woman savagely sodomized”. Speech limits need to at least effectively limit something, if they are going to chill adults access to free speech, among other hurdles, or they are unconstitutional.