4 ms·
There is not one set theory, there are many. The author doesn't like Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory which is fine. And semantics in ZF set theory is for some theo
by hackandthink 3y ago
There is not one set theory, there are many.
The author doesn't like Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory which is fine. And semantics in ZF set theory is for some theories not possible or intuitive.
Semantics in category theory sets (Topos) is usually the way to go (1).
"Topoi behave much like the category of sets" (2)
Lawvere, a renowned category theorist, wrote a book "SETS FOR MATHEMATICS", which describes different kinds of sets (topoi).
(1) https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relation+between+type+theory+and+category+theory https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relation+between+type+theory+a...
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topos
- discarded1023 3y agoThe author, Larry Paulson, may or may not like ZF but he has a ton of experience in doing formal proofs in it. https://isabelle.in.tum.de/website-Isabelle2020/dist/library/ZF/index.html https://isabelle.in.tum.de/website-Isabelle2020/dist/library...
- hackandthink 3y agoThanks, did not know. Maybe this is the reason for his dislike. Would like to hear more about Larry Paulson's experience. (maybe it was no fun at all)