3 ms·

>There are viable and constitutional means to achieve Texas’s goal What do they have in mind, I wonder?

• defrost 3y ago
  Why wonder when the full statement by the court is linked? https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172751222/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172751222.36.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.11... eg: One alternative the court discusses (page 43) is: Plaintiffs propose adult controls on children’s devices, many of which already exist and can be readily set up. This “content filtering” is effectively the modern version of “blocking and filtering software” that the Supreme Court proposed as a viable alternative in Ashcroft v. ACLU. 542 U.S. at 666–73. Blocking and filtering software is less restrictive because adults may access information without having to identify themselves. And the Court agreed with the finding that “filters are more effective than age-verification requirements.”