4 ms·
It is not, in fact, on their property. The airspace belongs to the public. It is ironic that they would deprive others of their property rights in the name of p
by Ao7bei3s 3y ago
It is not, in fact, on their property. The airspace belongs to the public. It is ironic that they would deprive others of their property rights in the name of perceived property rights. I would certainly hope for a felony conviction in such a case. I have no sympathy for people who would use weapons to illegally enrich themselves at the expense of others.
And by the way, as has been decided this year (though it might yet be appealed) in the Wyoming border crossing case, even using a ladder to cross through the airspace above private lands is not trespassing.
- flangola7 3y agoWho said anything about enrichment? We have a right to privacy and quiet enjoyment. Corporations aren't people, they don't have moral rights. If shooting/netting them down catches on they can't arrest everyone. "Father becomes imprisoned felon for taking down invasive corporate/government drone that spied on their home" will not be a headline that garners sympathy for the drone operator.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]