3 ms·
I meant more like the code they are using these days for that same problem of ab initio oxygen isotopes or whatever it would be called. I know they didn't use G
by ftxbro 3y ago
I meant more like the code they are using these days for that same problem of ab initio oxygen isotopes or whatever it would be called. I know they didn't use GPU for things until recently, like maybe even now they haven't converted it yet.
- jacquesm 3y agoYou can bet that the people that need that kind of compute power are aware of the available options, they're not exactly stupid (to put it mildly).
- ftxbro 3y agoYeah you would think, which is why I was wondering "is there a code that i can run to check the stability" but apparently that's a silly thing to ask for some reason.
- jacquesm 3y agoI don't think there is such a thing as a silly question but consider this: it's not just 'running the code', you need to actually understand the problem and short of a career in physics you're looking at 'numbers in that make no sense to you' and 'numbers out that make no sense to you'. To be able to meaningfully contribute you'd have to do a ton of groundwork first and then by the time you're ready to put your GPU goodies to work you'll probably find that path well trodden by others. For instance: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5763440 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5763440
- ftxbro 3y ago> I don't think there is such a thing as a silly question but consider this: it's not just 'running the code', you need to actually understand the problem and short of a career in physics you're looking at 'numbers in that make no sense to you' and 'numbers out that make no sense to you'. ok but what if the numbers do make sense to me tho, maybe i'm a computational physicist in some other area but not that one > by the time you're ready to put your GPU goodies to work you'll probably find that path well trodden by others yes that's what i was asking, what are the codes that others who have trodden that path are using
- ftxbro 3y ago> For instance: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5763440 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5763440 > Our GPU implementation shows a speedup up to 97.3 times over Matlab Implementation and 2.89 times over the Intel Math Kernel Library implementation on a Intel Core i7 920 Processor Interesting it's only 3x as fast on GPU as MKL on CPU I wonder how it compares to OpenBLAS. Oh but it's 2011 before GPU had really popped off, especially for larger precision. Probably in 2023 there is bigger GPU benefit vs. CPU.