2 ms·

I think one of your major mistakes is taking Russias and Putins word at face value and not accounting for the fact that they rarely keep any promises / agreemen

by _kbh_ 3y ago

I think one of your major mistakes is taking Russias and Putins word at face value and not accounting for the fact that they rarely keep any promises / agreements they have if it doesn’t serve them. Just see the Budapest memorandum as a great example, the Budapest memorandum was a victory for the world and it requires Russia to do was to not invade Ukraine But they couldn’t stick to it. Another good example is the likely deal between Yevgeny Prigozhin and Putin after the failed coup attempt, he then a handful of months later dies in a plane crash.

pphysch 3y ago
The Budapest Memorandum was annulled when one of its signatories blatantly violated its first clause in early 2014 (if not earlier). ...and Russia annexed Crimea in response. But that won't stop you from coming up with infinite reasons why we ought to close our eyes and ears in denial.
- _kbh_ 3y ago
  > The Budapest Memorandum was annulled when one of its signatories blatantly violated its first clause in early 2014 (if not earlier). > ...and Russia annexed Crimea in response. Ah yes it's not because Russia invaded and annexed Crimea at gun point that was the violation of the Budapest Memorandum im sure it's something else that you'll come up with that makes it 'annulled'. Something that makes it someone else's fault and not the person holding the guns to peoples heads. I presume you think that Ukraine deserves its nuclear weapons and long range bombers back from Russia, considering the agreement was 'annulled'?.