3 ms·
It seems to be entirely possible that someone can simultaneously believe that porn is bad and that the government should have no particular insight into whether
by woodruffw 3y ago
It seems to be entirely possible that someone can simultaneously believe that porn is bad and that the government should have no particular insight into whether you watch it.
- boringuser2 3y ago[flagged]
- bigbillheck 3y ago> most former ones have since moved on Oh if only.
- woodruffw 3y agoI'm not a libertarian. It's just a pointless, wasteful, and manifestly stifling incursion on something that needs social education (much like booze, you're never going to kill porn).
- boringuser2 3y ago[flagged]
- woodruffw 3y agoPlease read comments charitably. This site has rules to that effect. Social education means that the government should commit funds and other resources to educating the public (especially young men) about the un-reality of pornography and its insufficiency as a substitute for normal human intimacy. This is what other developed countries do[1]. Edit: and note: this is an obviously non-libertarian position to hold. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQKPWq38cVY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQKPWq38cVY