3 ms·
Well, it’s ok to vent about things like that as long as it’s substantive. One way to facilitate this kind of discussion is to remember that topics like this nee
by sillysaurusx 3y ago
Well, it’s ok to vent about things like that as long as it’s substantive. One way to facilitate this kind of discussion is to remember that topics like this need to become more substantive, not less. As it stands there’s very little in your comment, let alone a substantive point about why OpenAI is bad.
It’s hard to argue that OpenAI hasn’t helped pretty much everyone who’s used ChatGPT at all. That they do it for a profit doesn’t really change that equation much. Obviously I’d love to see them open source GPT-4 too, since it was trained on the world’s data. But they’re not compelled to.
- kashyapc 3y agoOf course they're "not compelled to". Why would they? The legal/regulatory "situation" allows them to get away at this point. I hope we fix this kind of pilfering soon. We're still navigating the sleaziness (or whatever you call it) involved here to train unfettered on open source and public data, and not meaningfully propagate the benefits back to the contributors. This is uncharted terrain as of now.