3 ms·
I disagree too. He asks “If it is truly exponential, why is it not just 28^2× (aka 784×) harder than hydrogen?”. The answer is that he misunderstood exponential
by db48x 3y ago
I disagree too. He asks “If it is truly exponential, why is it not just 28^2× (aka 784×) harder than hydrogen?”. The answer is that he misunderstood exponential growth, and thus it is at least 19342813113834066795298816× harder than hydrogen.
- rich_sasha 3y agoYou misunderstood English. I'm saying simulating 28 quantum particles is not merely O(28^2) harder than one. Because it is exponential...
- shwaj 3y agoHe is not asking anything. He is making a statement. When someone says “that’s why A, and also why B”, they’re making a statement, not asking a question just because the word “why” appears. The lack of a question mark is also a clue.