> Govts have no more inherent ability to be consistent than markets. Not so. Being consistent requires a redundant system. A redundant system is not the most

> Govts have no more inherent ability to be consistent than markets. Not so. Being consistent requires a redundant system. A redundant system is not the most efficient one. > Since markets create far fewer human rights violations than govts, markets are better here as well. I will venture a guess and say that just as many human rights violations have been committed in the name of the free market than any government. Sweatshops anyone? But my point with that comment was not to argue semantics. It was to point out that you were arguing apples and oranges.