4 ms·
I thought it gives good guidance. Of course it's not a 4-hour in-person workshop, like what you're proposing. But it already adds positive value. It covers a
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I thought it gives good guidance.
Of course it's not a 4-hour in-person workshop, like what you're proposing. But it already adds positive value.
It covers a good amount of the topics your course covers, I think. Introductory-level, perhaps, but it's a start.
Honestly? I don't understand your comment - I read as negative towards OpenAI (am I wrong?)
I'd expect someone like you to praise OpenAI's willingness to contribute in this space.
- chankstein38 3y agoYeah I read this and was repeatedly surprised and thankful they finally put some of these things in writing. That section about whether or not detectors work is going to be hugely helpful to students wrongly accused of using AI to generate their essays or something. Take that page and show it to your teacher "Look! The publisher of the thing says those detectors aren't accurate!" I'm with you the parent seems more like an ad and negativity towards OpenAI.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 3y ago<< I'd expect someone like you to praise OpenAI's willingness to contribute in this space. Why would you assume OP position in this case? There are multiple valid, albeit unstated reasons, why the company in question may not be the best vessel for those efforts. And, just to make sure that is not left unsaid, it is not like openAI is doing it for altruistic reason. I do agree that it is not a bad starting material, but I think you will agree that it is clearly not targeted at group that gathers at HN.
- rmbyrro 3y agoIt gave me the impression this person is concerned about helping teachers navigate this new and challenging reality. Call me crazy, but that was the impression I had from the comment and the course website.