3 ms·
6 digit years seem like a solution to a problem that will never be for the sake of looking forward thinking. There's absolutely no way current technology or soc
by NikkiA 3y ago
6 digit years seem like a solution to a problem that will never be for the sake of looking forward thinking. There's absolutely no way current technology or social norms will last 8000 years.
- sedatk 3y agoIt just makes great easter eggs. "Hey, this guy had set his reminder to today. I wonder what he'd think if he knew we actually saw this 56,000 years later" "Well, let's regenerate him and ask"
- atoav 3y agoYeah, but don't forget we use computers for things that don't involve today only. Let's say you run a climate calculation for long enough for example. Now you could just say "fuck dates" if they error — but wouldn't it be kinda nice if they didn't?
- tgv 3y agoIf you want to project something beyond 9999-12-31, you can do that with custom timestamps, e.g. by specifying the year as a float. There's no need to convert that back to a timezone or sync it to UTC. The maximum difference of 1 day would be 0.00003% in 10K and decreasing, a level of accuracy no simulation can ever achieve.
- NikkiA 3y agoWould you really need a full date and time stamp for doing that? If you're talking about projections 10,000 years in the future do you care if it's mid-afternoon on a tuesday?
- ijmacd 3y agoYou can also use 5, or 7 digit years, or whatever the two parties can agree to before communication starts. Part 2 of the standard gives examples of years with 10 digits.
- alphager 3y ago6 digit years are a solution for a problem we have today. Think geologist simulating continental drift.
- rsynnott 3y ago6 digit years aren't really _enough_ for that, tho; you're going to be looking at well over 100k years in most cases. (I can definitely see cases where 6 digit years would be useful, tho)