2 ms·
much more relevant than OP's unsourced speculations I think! The first link is not "speculative". It's projecting from the current (very high) rate of landfill
by culi 3y ago
much more relevant than OP's unsourced speculations I think!
The first link is not "speculative". It's projecting from the current (very high) rate of landfill waste to try to predict how much will be going to the landfill with the ongoing boom
- gaganyaan 3y agoIt does no such thing. Why would you lie about that when anyone can just go and read it? > Using real U.S. data, we modeled the incentives affecting consumers’ decisions whether to replace under various scenarios They model replacement, and assume that the replaced equipment is going into a landfill, which is exactly the OP's point that it won't. It's entirely speculative, and based on assumptions OP says aren't true. Why would you post that?