2 ms·
> is that the professional journalism you speak of No. Obviously not. > It takes zero years to be a modern journalist Yes. That's obviously not what I mean
by lisper 3y ago
> is that the professional journalism you speak of
No. Obviously not.
> It takes zero years to be a modern journalist
Yes. That's obviously not what I meant by "professional journalist." Most web "journalists" are professional journalists in the same way the Kent Hovind is a professional scientist.
There isn't a sharp distinction, just like there isn't a sharp definition of what pornography is. But most people can nonetheless recognize it when they see it.
- aydyn 3y ago[flagged]
- lisper 3y agohttps://arstechnica.com/ https://arstechnica.com/ https://www.aljazeera.com/ https://www.aljazeera.com/ https://en.wikipedia.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/ https://www.snopes.com/ https://www.snopes.com/ (at least they used to be, not so sure any more since they changed ownership a few years back) I could go on and on. It's not particularly hard to find.
- test098 3y agohttps://www.propublica.org/ https://www.propublica.org/ https://theintercept.com/ https://theintercept.com/ https://www.readfrontier.org/ https://www.readfrontier.org/ https://www.texastribune.org/ https://www.texastribune.org/ https://thelensnola.org/ https://thelensnola.org/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/