> It's clear he was beholden to the financial industry and that stinks but is technically above board. IMO your definition of "corruption" has a very low bar.

> It's clear he was beholden to the financial industry and that stinks but is technically above board. IMO your definition of "corruption" has a very low bar. ;-) > I'm going to hazard a guess that his legacy matters more to him then cash in the bank. Legacy requires election which requires campaign donors. It's quid pro quo. Theoretically, elected representatives are supposed to represent their constituents, not their donors. > I find it fascinating that those that obsess over "Crooked Joe" seem to change their tune when their preferred candidate comes under scrutiny. I just said literally "I don't identify with any political party or politician, in case you think this criticism is partisan."