4 ms·
"The only reasonable explanation is corruption." It's a reasonable explanation, but not the only one. You're taking a huge organization or organizations (UK go
by jzb 3y ago
"The only reasonable explanation is corruption."
It's a reasonable explanation, but not the only one. You're taking a huge organization or organizations (UK government departments) that have a revolving door of top-level leadership, plus ever-evolving technology, plus another huge organization (IBM) with a huge cast of people constantly being shuffled around...
Incompetence, disorganization, bad management, bouts of good management trying to re-rail things, new leadership undoing old leadership decisions... I can think of lots of reasons why government projects fail that aren't directly tied to corruption. (And just because there's corruption in a deal doesn't mean the vendor won't deliver, the two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.)
- cjbgkagh 3y agoOnce corruption has set in the other explanations like 'apathy' and 'incompetence' are no longer reasonable as it is very much in the interest of someone to leverage that apathy and incompetence for corrupt reasons. The idea that people who professionally siphon off public money will let $70M slip by without getting a piece of that action does not hold water.